Indoor Positioning Test Results | Marvelmind

Product Demos

Indoor Positioning Test Results | Marvelmind

▶ 2:06
📅 2018-02-14

Indoor Positioning Test Results | Marvelmind

🔗 Watch on YouTube

For more information, please contact: info@marvelmind.com

What This Video Covers

Marvelmind's independent test results demonstrate exceptional accuracy for indoor positioning systems right out of the box. The differential average standard deviation achieves 1.0cm (XYZ) and 0.8cm (XY plane), while absolute accuracy reaches 3.2cm (XYZ) and 1.9cm (XY). Detailed Excel statistics reveal performance metrics that can be further improved through averaging techniques and calibration procedures, making this indoor tracking system ideal for autonomous robots, drone navigation, and warehouse automation applications.

Key Takeaways

  • 1.0cm differential standard deviation (XYZ) and 0.8cm (XY plane) demonstrates industry-leading precision for autonomous robot and drone tracking
  • 3.2cm absolute accuracy (XYZ) and 1.9cm (XY) suitable for warehouse automation and forklift tracking without extensive calibration
  • Performance metrics achievable with default settings—further optimization possible through averaging and calibration procedures
  • Transparent, independently documented test methodology provides confidence for system selection and deployment planning
  • Ultrasonic indoor positioning technology delivers RTLS capabilities without GPS, ideal for indoor navigation of autonomous systems

👥 Who Should Watch This

Roboticists, warehouse automation engineers, and logistics managers evaluating indoor positioning systems for autonomous robots, drones, and forklifts. This content solves the critical problem of understanding real-world accuracy performance of ultrasonic indoor positioning systems before deployment.

? FAQ

Q: What accuracy can I expect from Marvelmind's indoor positioning system out of the box?
Default settings deliver 1.0cm differential standard deviation (XYZ) and 0.8cm (XY plane), with 3.2cm absolute accuracy (XYZ) and 1.9cm (XY). These can be significantly improved through averaging and calibration.
Q: How does differential accuracy differ from absolute accuracy in indoor positioning?
Differential accuracy (1.0cm) measures relative position changes and is crucial for tracking autonomous robots and drones. Absolute accuracy (3.2cm) measures position relative to global reference points, important for warehouse layout alignment and compliance.
Q: Can Marvelmind's RTLS accuracy be improved beyond default test results?
Yes. Point-based averaging and prior system calibration can significantly reduce standard deviation. Detailed implementation guidance is available in our planning and setup documentation.
Q: Is this indoor positioning system suitable for forklift tracking in warehouses?
Yes. The demonstrated accuracy and out-of-the-box performance make it ideal for warehouse automation, forklift tracking, and autonomous vehicle navigation in indoor environments.
Q: Where can I access the detailed test statistics?
Complete test data is available in the downloadable Excel spreadsheet (6-point test statistics), which documents measurement methodology and all statistical results.

Detailed Overview

This comprehensive test demonstrates Marvelmind's ultrasonic indoor positioning system performance using default out-of-the-box settings. The documented results provide critical accuracy benchmarks for engineers and integrators deploying RTLS solutions in warehouse automation and autonomous vehicle applications. Differential average standard deviation measures relative positioning accuracy at 1.0cm across three dimensions (XYZ) and 0.8cm in the XY plane, representing the system's precision for tracking autonomous robots and drones. Absolute average standard deviation of 3.2cm (XYZ) and 1.9cm (XY) indicates the system's accuracy relative to physical reference points—essential for forklift tracking and indoor location-based services. The detailed Excel spreadsheet from the six-point test protocol provides transparency into measurement methodology and statistical confidence. Importantly, these factory settings can be significantly improved through point-based averaging and prior system calibration, allowing integrators to optimize performance for specific warehouse layouts and autonomous robot applications. This data-driven approach to indoor positioning validation helps facilities managers and robotics teams make informed decisions about indoor navigation system selection and implementation strategies.

# Topics

indoor positioningaccuracyrtls testingindoor navigationpositioning system performancewarehouse automationautonomous robots

📍 Need precise indoor positioning for your project?

Plan Your System →

For more information, please contact: info@marvelmind.com
Scroll to Top